A few years ago when then-Mayor Steve Bach revived the long-deferred Pikes Peak Summit House Project, preliminary estimates of project costs were between $15-20 million. That figure has ballooned to $47.5 million, leaving a $30 million fundraising gap.

But help may be on the way.

“The Broadmoor is very excited about the prospects of a new Summit House,” said Broadmoor Hotel CEO Jack Damioli in an email. “This new facility will be a wonderful addition to Pikes Peak, America’s Mountain, and for the greater tourism community of Colorado Springs.  In addition, I am pleased to inform you that The Anschutz Foundation is making a substantial commitment to kick off the fund raising campaign for the project.”

Building a new Summit House won’t be easy. Supporters have long realized that the effort can’t succeed without substantial funding from all the players on the Peak.

Building anew requires demolishing all existing structures on the summit and consolidating various uses into a single iconic structure.

But as plans advanced, costs increased. Architects, contractors and engineers wrestled with multiple obstacles. As a consequence of these and many other factors (including soaring national construction costs since 2011), the estimated total cost of the facility is now $47.5 million.

- Advertisement -

Peak challenge

The construction season on Pikes Peak lasts only a few months, and poses unique challenges. Workers are limited to 6.5 hours per day, and must deal with volatile weather and frequent lightning storms.

The summit isn’t a solid granite monolith but rather a rock glacier, a tumbled boulder field cemented in place by permafrost. To prevent the new visitor center from settling and shifting like the existing building, it’ll be anchored to bedrock deep beneath the boulder field.

“Because it sits on federal land,” according to the city of Colorado Springs, “the summit complex is required to meet [Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design] silver certification.”

That adds more cost, but the project team is aiming even higher, pursuing the Living Building Challenge.

“Only about two dozen projects worldwide have achieved full Net Zero Building Certification,” said Stuart Coppedge, principal at RTA Architects, the Colorado Springs firm selected to design the building. “It’s a lofty goal, but one fitting for a national icon such as the Pikes Peak Summit Complex.”

$30 million short

The question: How do you close a $30 million funding gap? Seeking answers, the city hired the Benefactor Group, a Columbus, Ohio-based fundraising consultant, to do a campaign feasibility study.

The answer: You probably can’t, at least not through a Colorado Springs-based fundraising appeal.

The 33-page report “assessed the philanthropic appeal and the potential leadership and leadership gifts for a proposed $30 million campaign to support a new complex of facilities at the summit of Pikes Peak.”

The study’s totals may reflect the area’s limited capacity.

“Using national averages that estimate the allocation of charitable gifts to the fields of Arts and Culture, Environment, and Public-Society Benefit, we estimate that 2014-15 yielded a total of $58.3 million from donors with interest in these sectors across Teller and El Paso counties. It should be noted that these resources are currently devoted to existing organizations and would need to be increased or redirected to the Summit Complex project.”

And the varying interests of the summit players pose yet another set of problems. As the consultants put it, “Relationships between the partners in the renewal of the Summit Complex — the city of Colorado Springs, the U.S. Forest Service, the U.S. Army, and others — are complicated.”

The consultants recommended that project backers lower their fundraising goal to $15 million, and create a 501(c)3 to receive contributions. Even if successful, there would still be a multi-million dollar shortfall. How could that be addressed?

Given that Phil Anschutz owns the Cog Railway, the Broadmoor Hotel and Xanterra Parks & Resorts, the United States’ largest park concessions management company, a contribution by the billionaire seems like a good fit.

If summit house supporters can raise $15 million, will Anschutz make up the difference?

Immediately after Anschutz acquired The Broadmoor, he was asked whether he saw Colorado Springs as an undervalued asset.

“Absolutely!” he responded.

Does he feel the same way about Pikes Peak? It seems so, and that’s good news for summit house supporters, the local visitor industry and all those who treasure our iconic mountain.


  1. If Philip Anschutz offered me one million dollars I wouldn’t accept so much as one thin dime of it. Too many strings come attached to his generosity. IMHO, the Summit Complex is over-designed. It could have been far less ambitious for far less money and still be quite worthy of “America’s Mountain”.

  2. Has anyone considered that since it is on federal land and considered “America’s Mountain” that someone petition the federal government for assistance? The President has an infrastructure plan out there somewhere, and he likes projects with joint commitments from local and private partnerships, this sounds like a good fit for inclusion to that plan.

Comments are closed.