This rendering shows what a portion of downtown would resemble after improvements were made under C4C.
This rendering shows what a portion of downtown would resemble after improvements were made under C4C.

The debate over City for Champions has evolved (or devolved) into a single-subject argument. The context: Should local tax-increment financing (TIF) be used to cover approximately $100 million of the $250 million proposal? Is TIF a painless way to fund major civic improvements, or is it a sophisticated scam, a way for special interests to […]

This content is only available to members of the CSBJ.

To gain access, you’ll need to sign in or purchase Basic Free, Digital, Print & Digital Plus, Print & Digital, Print, Digital and The Transcript or Digital Monthly

If you’re already a member, sign in here.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here