Throughout the expansive room inside Library 21c, interested people gathered in clusters, listening to others, asking questions and receiving answers.

The crowd estimated at 250 to 300 might not have been fully united, but on this Tuesday evening, even the known cynics kept their confrontational instincts in check.

The event was billed as a “different” kind of informational meeting, as City for Champions organizers continued trying to cultivate support with a more wide-open format.

If you wanted to talk about the U.S. Olympic Museum, you could go face-to-face with Dick Celeste, the museum’s driving force and former Ohio governor as well as Colorado College president. If you wanted to discuss C4C finances, you could speak with Bob Cope, who has coordinated those complex specifics from inside city government.

If you were wondering about the Air Force Academy Gateway Visitors Center, you could walk up to AFA director of installations Carlos Cruz-Gonzalez — or the most recent former superintendent, retired Lt. Gen. Mike Gould.

And if you had questions about other aspects of City for Champions, people with specific knowledge were available to address topics — such as former Olympic Training Center resident-athlete Luke Travins, president of Concept Restaurants, one of the leaders of the push for the Sports and Event Center.

- Advertisement -

The mood was upbeat, not paranoid. Supporters of C4C realize they still have more work to do in selling the full concept, but for this fast-paced 90 minutes, they had a positive story to tell, and they had sharpened their message.

As someone who has followed the entire process, hoping for the best but willing to share (and write about) certain concerns, I wondered whether the latest effort would be worth the trouble. Perhaps it would be too elementary, another review of what we’ve heard before. Or one more pep rally, with everything but actual cheerleaders, merely trying to create positive vibes.


Don’t be surprised if space is left available in southwest downtown for a possible ballpark that could come later when Sky Sox ownership might be more amenable.

[/pullquote]But it wasn’t like that at all. You could find out as much as you wanted. Nobody shied away from direct questions. You simply had to ask, or be smart enough to listen while others asked.

At the start, C4C spokesperson Laura Neumann helped the audience by calling C4C “just the start … the gateway” and adding that “what comes after” could be equally significant. For emphasis, she offered three topics: 1. Other museums (such as for science and children) that might locate near the Olympic Museum; 2. Multi-modal transportation, including walkways, trolleys and even bike-shares around the proposed venues; and 3. Downtown residential projects (and new commerce) that inevitably would sprout up.

Those details, though encouraging, weren’t so new to regulars. I wanted more, and I was not disappointed. Some examples:

• Celeste explained in more detail why Olympic Museum leaders hope to raise $70 million in private donations. He sees the value in having enough to make sure the infrastructure (to be shared with the adjacent stadium-events complex) can be done early without delay, and also because construction might start sooner.

• If the city’s final contract is done as expected by Sept. 11, Celeste says we can expect to hear the first major announcements on donor commitments not long thereafter. Obviously, that would enhance momentum. Celeste also talked about replicating a public campaign that he helped push for the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame in Cleveland, selling personalized bricks or tiles for outside the museum, perhaps in the range of $200 to $300 each.

• The downtown stadium’s specifics remain uncertain, pending more input from many sports’ national governing bodies (such as what events will be targets, and crowds they might draw) and U.S. Olympic Committee experts who are well-versed in what makes for successful venues. In other words, whatever you’ve heard about the Sports and Event Center still is likely to be revised in weeks to come.

• Even if the Sports and Event Center isn’t built to handle baseball and the Colorado Springs Sky Sox (still my preference), don’t be surprised if space is left available in that general area for a ballpark that could come later when the Sky Sox ownership might be more amenable — after that area has become a magnet for people and events.

• People close to C4C understand one of the main public misconceptions: The package might have four components, but they can’t be choreographed to reach the finish line together. In fact, there will be four finish lines — with more after that.

See the point? That’s real substance. And legitimate reason for hope.


  1. Without a vote on the stadium and garage (approx 50% of the total), the skeptics and those who do not believe this is the answer to any downtown renaissance will never feel comfortable about how C4C has conducted themselves thus far. We are still hearing a ‘build it and they will come’and ‘trust us’ and the business plan will follow story lines. Not convincing arguments. The 5100 jobs and status of the venues is greatly inflated, the cost to the community is greatly deflated and data is not releasable due to proprietary information (easily removed). C4C has dropped any pretense that all the venues were interrelated and had to be done together or nothing. Mr Cope on three occassions mentioned the ‘successes’ of University Park when the bonds have been in default for the last two years and there is ‘absolutely no taxes from this project being given to the city’. And there is the possibility that this means for the next 30 years. Ralph, hold your breath for a SKY SOX Stadium downtown. And, vague promises of a children’s museum and intramodal transportation. We are squandering an opportunity by forcing the stadium, when there was time to discuss a ‘community project’. The next mayor might not be so amenable.

  2. This IS an amazing community project. I was delighted to see all of the community interaction and excitement at the last meeting. I liked that the informal format allowed people go to their area of interest and talk directly with the horse’s mouth. Ralph, you said it well… C4C is not the end-all be-all for Colorado Springs, but rather the beginning of a greater movement within our city. If we’re looking for C4C to save the day or to be the last great idea that this city’s had, we should all probably pack our bags and move on. Are the four project important? YES! However, truly becoming a City For Champions is much more paramount!

  3. Bill, where are you from? You’re definitely not a native and probably only started getting involved when you retired from the military and decided to make Colorado Springs your home. Yay for us! (sarcasm) You are absolutely negative about everything….and I mean EVERYTHING especially when it comes to having to pay taxes to improve our community. But I bet you’re one of the first to complain when your roads aren’t plowed after a snowstorm. You tout this project is not a benefit to our community yet you have never mentioned what you would like to see in an urban renewal project. Tell me your vision. I would honestly like to hear your grand plans on how to improve where we all live. Or are you happy with the status quo?

  4. C4C was clumsily introduced many months ago. We can’t do anything about that but we can do something about getting its proverbial “ducks in a row” for a well-reasoned financial presentation. Some very seasoned minds are putting those numbers together. Until they do let’s keep an open mind about something that can be the life spark that our trouble city needs. If you have an alternative idea to create jobs (because that’s what this is all about) please speak up!

Comments are closed.